Did you know there was a CPS Class Action going on?

[DID YOU HEAR ABOUT IT ON THE NEWS?]

28 MILLION PEOPLE COMPLAINING

Polk County has over 70,000 complaints aginast the Orego DHS / CPS Office.

That means the non criminal prosecutor ( DA ) is not doing right by the people and SOCIAL

WORKERS are getting away with 'murder' while judges and Attorneys look the other way.

This needs to STOP.

You need the CPS (free) HANDBOOK to help you understand what is going wrong. You need the

CPS (free) HANDBOOK before the Child Protective Services knock on your door. They don't tell

you your rights and neither do the POLICE. Get a Copy From (e-for-mation@hotmail.com )

ALSO AVAILABLE: Notice and Revocation of Power of Attorney.

ALSO AVAILABLE: NOTICE OF RESERVATOIN OF RIGHTS.

Because what you don't know can HURT YOU.

EXAMPLE:

Supreme Court said the you don't have to help DHS prove their case but judges punish you

if you don't cooperate.

(That is a violatoin of Judicial Code of Conduct)


EXAMPLE:

Did you know Attorneys work for the Court who appoint them first, THEN THEIR NEXT DUTY

IS TO THE STATE OF OREGON, before you? That if you give up your Personam, have a Court

Appointed Attorney 'Represent' your person, you become a WARD OF THE COURT, meaning

Person of Unsound Mind.



~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~

If your friends or neighboors have a complaint please let them know about my web site. If you

have a complaint you would like to post please send it to me to post on my blogs and send to the

media. Also, please get a Yuwie account, too you can get you story posted in as many places as

possible. My referral link to sign up http://r.yuwie.com/antigov

You tell your story, I'll tell you mine, and so forth. I have over 7,000 e-mail addresses I send Political

Complaints to and will help you get a copy of a Federal Injunction.


Legal Literacy is my Blog topic on MySpace & Yuwie & are for the purposes of CPS REFORM.

I have a seveal study groups to promote Legal Literacy so citizens do not become WARD of the

Court when in legal battles. Our families are not respected as an institution.



~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~

Find out about Child Protection Abuses of Power:


Blogs from MySpace are posted there.

 

This is cruel this is usual.
http://www.yuwie.com/blog/entry.asp?id=268928&eid=136496

The Sheriff, not the judge, who is the chief law enforcement officer.
http://www.yuwie.com/blog/entry.asp?id=268928&eid=136484

Death Penalty is equal to Termination of Parental Rights.
http://www.yuwie.com/blog/entry.asp?id=268928&eid=136480

Immediate assistance needed to end this intolerable judicial corruption.
http://www.yuwie.com/blog/entry.asp?id=268928&eid=136471

It Is Time For A Change!
http://www.yuwie.com/blog/entry.asp?id=268928&eid=136469

Torture in an ice chamber at the Orange County Sheriffs Office.
http://www.yuwie.com/blog/entry.asp?id=268928&eid=136464

Is a judge god?
http://www.yuwie.com/blog/entry.asp?id=268928&eid=135484

BEFORE you sign!!!
http://www.yuwie.com/blog/entry.asp?id=268928&eid=132942

God hates the double minded. Please stand with God.
http://www.yuwie.com/blog/entry.asp?id=268928&eid=137864

Regarding Two Things:
http://www.yuwie.com/blog/entry.asp?id=268928&eid=136959

TAKING BACK OUR COURTS
http://www.yuwie.com/blog/entry.asp?id=268928&eid=136485

~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~

I found the Emancipation Proclamation Petition over a year ago which is directed a reforming

the Court Process.

http://www.PetitionOnline.com/families/petition.html

A link is posted on my Blogs please go see why you should endorse that petition. But, if you do

endorse the Emancipation Proclamation Petition please include in your comment line 'Without

Prejudice' UCC 1-308, which is very important.

We are not gaining momentum on that petition fast enough. But, there are sources in the media

that are speaking the truth now regarding CPS abuses of Power.

Please help me get the articles posted on my Yuwie Blogs out to people. That truth will help

promote the Emancipation Proclamation Petition.

I post stories about Child Protective Service abuses of Power & to help inform people about

how to protect themselves. I will be posting Supreme Court rule decisions here that will help you

understand how important Legal Literacy is.

I collect as many complaints as I can. Tons of these Political Complaints are Posted on MySpace.

If you have not seen any of them please come here to get informatoin.

To shed light on this topic please find people with CPS abuse / injustice problems and I will Post

them here.


~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~@~

September 5, 2007 - Wednesday

Fw: THE NECK WHERE THREE HEADS OF THIS 'BEAST' WE GROW. Melanie LeBaron's AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF ADDENDUM TO REVOKE ADMINISTRATIVE AUTHORITY ON BEHALF OF VICTORIA COUVILLION, HER OFFSPRING   THE NECK WHERE THREE HEADS OF THIS 'BEAST' WE GROW. RULE 53 IS A NASTY KING PIN OF POWER.   The legal references: Where they fit in, my mother not knowing how to coordinate the look of it so other people will follow the violation of our privilege with a lawyer, producing a conflict of laws, which compels us to adhere to the bureaucratic worship over the opinion of a psychologist. 1.                            Mark Allen Heslinga, though not have authority in the noncriminal venue, co-non punished my mother, to leverage, on behalf of the DHS, a violation of the right to the fifth Amendment, when the Sixth was not properly upheld. "If any tribunal finds absence of proof of jurisdiction over person and subject matter, the case must be dismissed." Louisville RR v. Motley, 211 US 149, 29 S. Ct. 42. Mark Allen Heslinga, though having jurisdiction over criminal matters, did not present a case against the future crime Max R. Wall intended to prosecute without authority to do so.  Miller v US, 230 Fed 486,489 - "The claim and exercise of a Constitutional (guaranteed) right cannot be converted into a crime". Judge Avera had not jurisdiction over a future crime, while presiding a case continued based on a future crime,  and to this moment has no jurisdiction over something that can never be adjudicated. FACT: Affiant is not in receipt of the proper signatures of agent(s), principal or those who would validate the nature and cause of matter stated. Similarly, in any case in which it can be said that the evidence is such that it would not be utterly irrational for a jury to reach the result it has determined upon, and thus a valid question of fact does exist, the court may not conclude that the verdict is as a matter of law not supported by the evidence (see Middleton v Whitridge, supra, pp 507- 508). Mary Anne E. Miller's unborn could not be adjoined as a party to the action because there is no assignment to the State of Oregon, due to Roe Vs. Wade, since the unborn have not protection according to Supreme Court Rule. FACT: Affiant is not in receipt of the proper signatures of agent(s), principal or those who would validate the nature and cause of matter stated.- Clearfield Doctrine says: "Governments descend to the level of a mere private corporation, and take on the characteristics of a mere private citizen, (where private corporate commercial paper (FRN's) and securities is concerned) --- For the purposes of suit, such corporations and individuals are regarded as entities entirely separate from government." Bank of U.S. vs. Planter's Bank 9 Wheaton (22 US) 904 6 L.Ed. 24 My mother's Due Process rights can not be upheld when there is no complaint filed when she will never stand trial because there is no equal protection of the law in pre-conviction. "The benefits of the Constitution are maintained only by a belligerent Claimant in person," Judge Learned Hand - 1947.   My mother's lawyer said they needed an expert opinion...   1.    Only a Belligerent Claimant in person can defend rights. Rights cannot be defended by Attorney or Solicitor. United States v Johnson, 76 F. Supp. 538, 540 (DC, MD PA, 1947) - The privilege against self-incrimination is neither accorded to the passive resistant, nor the person who is ignorant of his rights, nor to one indifferent thereto. It is a fighting clause. Its benefits can be retained only by sustained combat. It can not be retained by attorney or solicitor. It is valid only when insisted upon by a belligerent claimant in person. The one who is persuaded by honeyed words or moral suasion to testify or produce documents rather than make a last ditch stand, simply loses the protection. Once he testifies to part, he has waived his right and must on cross examination or otherwise, testify as to the whole transaction. He must refuse to answer or produce, and test the matter in contempt proceedings, or by habeas corpus. US v Johnson, 76 F. Supp 538, 540 (1947). "The right of a person under the 5th Amendment to refuse to incriminate himself is purely a personal privilege of the witness. It was never intended to permit him to plead the fact that some third person might be incriminated by his testimony, even though he were the agent of such person." Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43: It is not right that my mother and I did not get incommunicado from the criminal upheld when what my mother, naively believing she had the right to privilege with her lawyer, presented all her mental notes to the Public Defender, which were intended as material for the affidavit she requested he write in support of a counter suet. "Lack of counsel of choice can be conceivably even worse than no counsel at all, or having to accept counsel beholden to one's adversary." Burgett v Texas, 389 US 109. - FACT: Affiant is not in receipt of any "exhibit(s)" which purport to be an "instrument" that validates the "nature and cause" of matter stated: with respect to: "which I never saw". Instead, of his putting her affidavit in order this is turned over to the DA, at the First Set of Double Continuances, the DHS, after that point diagnose my mother and are contaminated being provided a chance to collaborate, using what my mother deemed a claim, to retaliate. Instead of her lawyer organizing the details to leverage the facts and seek relief, by way of a counter suet, the DA, the DHS, and who knows who else, devise, in secret, a diagnosis, and collect one letter of complaint, which I never saw, from the IPD for Exhibit their diagnosis as fact, which impeaches them all. "I often wonder whether we do not rest our hopes too much upon Constitutions, upon laws and courts. These are false hopes, believe me; these are false hopes. Liberty lies in the hearts of men and women; when it dies there, no Constitution, no law, no court can save it." Judge Learned Hand. It is not just that instead of honoring a motion the Public Defender respectfully submitted requesting private records be seal, the courts honor that which is surmised in secret to become adjudicated, denying privilege and not granting my mother, my brother, and me the relief she sought for us, while our Sixth Amendment toppled and a secret channel of power revealed, one that is not subject to cross-examination. "The benefits of the Constitution are maintained only by a belligerent Claimant in person," Judge Learned Hand - 1947 Instead of allowing the Public Defender's motion, which if respected, would have resulted in the case being DISMISSED, but no, the DA turns around and enters an Oath of Affirmation, in the form of a diagnosis, and a future prediction of a crime. Such Facts are proof my mother had an appointment with a psychologist, a seer, the DHS, with respect to Max R. Wall, in communicating with the Public Defender, which shows nobody should ever talk to their Court Appointed Defender, because the DHS have the position to revoked our right to privileged with our lawyer, your right to choose your doctor, our right to privilege with a doctor, your right to set your own appointments, your right to decide what your symptoms are, our right to freedom of religion, your right to presentment, your right to a search warrant, your right to the Fifth Amendment, your right to enter you own plea of guilty by reason of mental defect, (since that can be entered for you by the DA), your right to complain against a caseworker, (which is a symptom in the eyes of a bureaucrat upon exercise of grievance), no matter if we say please when doing so in the presence of a judge. You will not get a jury trial because a tribunal is competent to give an Article III trial because the chancery is not a true "trier of fact." The UCC is a fact issue when the court has been notified by Affidavit, notary stamp and certified post or you can make the trip to the clerks office. Some crude examples of fact statements are shown below. The facts are based on UCC 3-501 to show that you do not need to call on the UCC by name to get your Affidavit before the judge. In some cases this may be the correct method because a chancellery will be prejudiced against the mention of the UCC and a lawyer will not ask a judge these example questions. I don't think it is just that my mother requested a jury for her custody case and a technicality is more important than my mother's voice, by brother's voice, or mine, when that technicality, claimed by a judge, gives him power to deny my brother's request, which was told the judge by his father and mother, who both said, "Bleu wants to come home", while yet another judge can say, "I don't understand it word 'in'", and your Constitutional rights all disappear. Next to the fact that the Oregon State Bar can say, "I don't understand", and the accountability to the DA to uphold your Constitutional rights can disappear, too. The Rights of the People are inalienable and the source of Law. A chancellor cannot displace our inheritance unless we waive our Rights and allow statue to overtake us by our own ignorance.   The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it. 16 Am Jur 2d, Sec. 177; late 2d, Sec 256 The Constitution is a written instrument. As such its meaning does not alter. That which it meant when adopted, it means now. South Carolina vs. United States (1905) I don't think it is fair, when ignorance is no excuse, judges and Bar Affiliates can self-effacingly say, "I don't understand", which only safeguards the Licensed, who collectively deny my mother, my brother, and me our Natural Right to be together, when what defines their 'legalized ignorance' is clarified only by what they ignore, which is their Oath to Uphold and Defend something contracted away by assign to the State of Oregon, while their admitted 'lack of understanding' makes me a slave to them. I don't think it is fair, that their method of helping me understand comes at such a high price to me, when what I understood to be my right was denied me, and certainly the method for demanding judicial understanding is re-defined to hide the a way to enforce it, while Judge Luukinen clearly thinks, "Get a lawyer or get a broken arm" is a just parable. Yet, one day when he stands asking for entrance at the Golden Gates, he is going to be asked; "Why is it that when men, who never stood in assembly, learn not the rules to which they are bound, but held accountable to that which they were never taught, and could not easily understand?", "Why is it, when I do not hold men accountable to that which they did not recognize or understand to be law, men invent ways to keep that which is enforceable a secret?" "How is it just, when in your first language, a request for bread is made, of which you have plenty, and My children were denied their request and given a cast instead?" "How is it that when your second language, was never taught My children, you sit in My thrown and deny them bread, when that request is understood by your knowledge into their method of asking", "How is it that you sat in My thrown, and enforced a commercialized, foreign standard, replacing My every Precept, erecting your own Decree above that which I declared Law unto My creation?" "How is just, when you, in witness of My child while going in want, let them continue to hunger, failing to provide them with bread, you knowing they did not learn how to ask, having naught knowledge of your secret method, or language, while you clearly see what they should ask, and continuing to announce they should ask, also stating there is a secret method, and fail to teach them how?" "How is it that when My children came, seeking My justice, they are ADJUDICATED by Precepts established for a minority, and are lead by your lack of adherence to My Statutes into Sodom and Gomorrah's rule instead?"   Subject to UCC 1-308 ROUGH DRAFT APPROVED BY,  Melanie LeBaron, who by DMV regulation is attached to her mother's (pen) had claimed her own voice and Power of Attorney,  at the time the AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS was signed, which was prevented by a LIAR, when seized at the date of 'Trial'. Which goes to, Now comes Melanie LeBaron...having acquired her mother's pen... which today, as well as then, was valid and filed due to her mother's efforts.     ----- Original Message ----- From: RE-Polk Judge To: wallmax ; smorrill@osbar.org ; Robert F. Suchy ; mad at cps ; john ; info@americansbulletin.com ; icandseeyou999@yahoo.com ; horner-william ; hammill.renee_co.polk.or.us ; gmwarm ; Elizabeth Edwards ; Electronic Frontier Foundation ; elaine@salemlaw.cc ; e-for-mation ; dogettydoggonedo ; Department of Human Services ; askdoj@usdoj.gov Cc: To Fred Avera C/O We the People ; Thomas A. B. LeBaron ; sheriff@polksheriff.net ; mel bleu me LeBaron ; Mark Allen Heslinga ; Marilyn LeBaron ; juvi-rep-noncrime ; judgethebench ; judgeofpolkaveray@hotmail.com ; judge_of_polk_avera_y ; igou.rick@ci.independence.or.us ; governor ; Goveners Advocassy Office Felton ; FBI 503-224-4181 ; Darlene Rogers ; casemakdr ; AnnetteTesch ; ACLU of Oregon Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2007 2:17 AM Subject: THE NECK WHERE THREE HEADS OF THIS 'BEAST' WE GROW. 4:33 AM - 0 Comments - 0 Kudos - Add Comment - Edit - Remove

Moody friends. Drama queens. Your life? Nope! - their life, your story.
Play Sims Stories at Yahoo! Games.